tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post2162122020777942895..comments2023-06-18T11:09:22.214-05:00Comments on Dread Tomato Addiction: The Case for Firearms InsuranceDan Eastwoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14105563883467108602noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post-2175566521575013472014-11-24T00:35:23.367-06:002014-11-24T00:35:23.367-06:00This form of public liability insurance would rais...This form of public liability insurance would raise no eyebrows at all in the UK or Europe, where I insure myself against the risk of injuring a third party whilst skiing or kayaking,<br /><br />Kind regards, Chris.Chris Kemphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15784847480097649252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post-9360362180333188132013-01-16T10:09:57.889-06:002013-01-16T10:09:57.889-06:00Hello Anon2,
If your weapon falls into the hands o...Hello Anon2,<br />If your weapon falls into the hands of someone who uses it to cause harm, your rates would definitely go up. If you own a weapon and cannot demonstrate (to the insurance company) that you can store it safely, or are otherwise at higher risk the gun being used innappropriately, you might expect to pay higher rates in the first place.<br /><br />I presume that some acts would needDan Eastwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14105563883467108602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post-71490138012007113982013-01-16T01:17:52.502-06:002013-01-16T01:17:52.502-06:00Wait a minute. Wouldn't this require a crimina...Wait a minute. Wouldn't this require a criminal to purchase said insurance? Or is my premium randomly going to go up because my insurance covered a random persons medical bills? I understand the general premise of your ideas but exactly how do you suppose this be implemented?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post-9503175083190168642013-01-03T19:59:32.487-06:002013-01-03T19:59:32.487-06:00Anon, you seem to misunderstand the purpose. The i...Anon, you seem to misunderstand the purpose. The insurance would pay out to the victims, not the gun owner. Dan Eastwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14105563883467108602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4284078334691483098.post-90516082895593949662013-01-03T18:56:02.776-06:002013-01-03T18:56:02.776-06:00LOL another insurance for somebody to get rich off...LOL another insurance for somebody to get rich off of and bailed out from under some new government scandal. NO THANKS!!! and I'm not pro gun or anti gun. OK i lied i'm more pro gun then anti gun. but i wouldn't consider myself a nut. its just an absolute financial suicide mission. and another opening to scam people. IE: i hire a guy to murder my dreadfull wife. turn on him and have Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com